Number of Subjects in Study Archive: 30
Study Design: Interventional
Conditions: Biliary Atresia
Division: DDN
Duration: October 2013 - July 2016
Treatment: Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG)
Available Genotype Data: No
Image Summary: No
Transplant Type: None
Does it have dialysis patients: No
Clinical Trials URL:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01854827
Study Website: https://childrennetwork.org/Clinical-Studies/studies/PRIME
Data Package Version Number: 1 (April 19, 2024)
The PRIME study was a multicenter prospective phase I/IIA open label trial, aimed at assessing the feasibility, tolerability, and safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy following hepatic portoenterostomy (HPE) in infants with biliary atresia (BA). After enrollment, participants received three intravenous doses of IVIG at designated intervals over the first 60 days following HPE and were followed for 360 days. All infants in this trial were also treated with standardized doses of other routine standard-of-care treatments for BA and this routine clinical care was not modified by participation in this study.
The primary objectives the PRIME study were to determine the feasibility, acceptability, tolerability, and safety profile of IVIG treatment administered to infants after hepatic portoenterostomy (HPE) for biliary atresia, and investigate preliminary evidence of activity and explore mechanisms of action.
The primary outcome measures were feasibility and acceptability of IVIG treatment, and any serious adverse events.
Inclusion criteria:
Detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria can be found in the study protocol.
Administration of IVIg infusions was feasible and acceptable in 79%. None of the serious adverse events (SAEs) were directly related to IVIg infusions; however, 90% of participants had a SAE. Compared with a historical placebo arm group, there was no significant increase in the proportion of IVIg participants with a serum total bilirubin < 1.5 mg/dL at 90, 180, or 360 days post-HPE. Survival with the native liver in the IVIg participants showed no significant benefit over the historical placebo arm, with a difference at 360 days of -11.9% (IVIg: 58.6%, placebo: 70.5%; 90% UCB: 2.1%; p > 0.05).